Existuje v\u016fbec je\u0161t\u011b n\u011bjak\u00e1 politika? Opravdov\u00e1 politika jako usilovn\u00e1 polemika mezi odli\u0161n\u00fdmi spole\u010densk\u00fdmi koncepcemi, mezi r\u016fzn\u00fdmi p\u0159\u00edstupy ke vztahu mezi st\u00e1tem a jednotlivcem? Skoro to vypad\u00e1, \u017ee u\u017e neexistuje.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Absenci politiky a skute\u010dn\u00fdch politick\u00fdch t\u00e9mat dnes zakr\u00fdvaj\u00ed osobn\u00ed p\u016ftky a tak\u00e9 tahanice o zcela technicistn\u00ed a jen parametrick\u00e9 n\u00e1le\u017eitosti uvnit\u0159 byrokratick\u00e9 ma\u0161in\u00e9rie. Spor tu ale z\u016fst\u00e1v\u00e1, ba je je\u0161t\u011b vygradovan\u011bj\u0161\u00ed. Ale nen\u00ed to spor politick\u00fd. Je to boj o \u017eivot. O p\u0159e\u017eit\u00ed.<\/p>\n
Je to boj o samo lidstv\u00ed, o z\u00e1klady na\u0161\u00ed kultury, o nejz\u00e1sadn\u011bj\u0161\u00ed ob\u010dansk\u00e9 svobody, o ctnosti, o tradice, o rodinu, o n\u00e1rody, o mezilidsk\u00e9 vztahy, o soukrom\u00ed. Je to boj mezi pokrokov\u00fdmi spole\u010densk\u00fdmi in\u017een\u00fdry na stran\u011b jedn\u00e9 a ochr\u00e1nci norm\u00e1ln\u00edho sv\u011bta a osv\u011bd\u010den\u00fdch hodnot na stran\u011b druh\u00e9. Boj mezi bezohledn\u00fdmi protla\u010dovateli genderismu, masov\u00e9 imigrace \u010di podneb\u00ed\u010dk\u00e1\u0159sk\u00e9ho fanatismu a t\u011bmi, kdo si necht\u011bj\u00ed nechat vz\u00edt sv\u016fj \u017eivot a zni\u010dit sv\u011bt, sv\u016fj zp\u016fsob existence.<\/p>\n
Ti prvn\u00ed jsou v ofenz\u00edv\u011b, ti druz\u00ed se br\u00e1n\u00ed a z posledn\u00edch sil h\u00e1j\u00ed zbytky poctiv\u00e9ho dobr\u00e9ho oby\u010dejn\u00e9ho \u017eivota. Pr\u00e1v\u011b prob\u011bhl\u00e9 volby do Evropsk\u00e9ho parlamentu ale nazna\u010duj\u00ed, jako kdyby t\u011bm prvn\u00edm malinko doch\u00e1zel dech. Podlehli toti\u017e p\u0159esv\u011bd\u010den\u00ed, \u017ee jejich c\u00edl v podob\u011b hroziv\u00e9 dystopie, v podob\u011b tot\u00e1ln\u011b \u0159\u00edzen\u00e9 spole\u010dnosti je u\u017eu\u017e nadosah, a sv\u016fj \u00fatok na n\u00e1\u0161 sv\u011bt zakcelerovali. A i tu \u010d\u00e1st spole\u010dnosti, kter\u00e1 a\u017e dosud na sob\u011b nechala d\u0159\u00edv\u00ed \u0161t\u00edpat, t\u00edmhle netaktick\u00fdm urychlen\u00edm zm\u011bn za\u010dali necht\u011bn\u011b probouzet.<\/p>\n
Ned\u011blejme si plan\u00e9 nad\u011bje, bezohlednost pokrokov\u00fdch \u00faderek v \u00fasil\u00ed o kone\u010dn\u00e9 z\u00fa\u010dtov\u00e1n\u00ed s n\u00e1mi reakcion\u00e1\u0159i bude nyn\u00ed ur\u010dit\u011b je\u0161t\u011b nar\u016fstat. V\u0161imn\u011bme si ale jednoho momentu, kter\u00fd mezi mnoha jin\u00fdmi pr\u00e1v\u011b prob\u011bhl\u00e9 volby uk\u00e1zaly. Uk\u00e1zaly zrod Nov\u00e9 nov\u00e9 levice.<\/p>\n
Pojem levice, dnes u\u017e sp\u00ed\u0161e Star\u00e1 levice, ten m\u00e1me vymezen docela p\u0159esn\u011b. Odvozuje se od d\u011blnick\u00e9ho hnut\u00ed v 19. stolet\u00ed. Sta\u0159\u00ed levi\u010d\u00e1ci, \u010dili socialist\u00e9, v\u017edy h\u00e1jili z\u00e1jmy zam\u011bstnanc\u016f, po\u017eadovali vy\u0161\u0161\u00ed m\u00edru p\u0159erozd\u011blov\u00e1n\u00ed, p\u0159\u00e1li si st\u00e1t siln\u00fd, soci\u00e1ln\u00ed, pe\u010dovatelsk\u00fd. V \u0161edes\u00e1t\u00fdch letech minul\u00e9ho stolet\u00ed ale v jejich st\u0159edu za\u010dal s\u00edlit proud, kter\u00fd byl nositelem teorie, \u017ee v dob\u011b pokro\u010dil\u00e9 automatizace, robotizace a n\u00e1r\u016fstu pod\u00edlu slu\u017eeb na tvorb\u011b bohatstv\u00ed se jejich p\u016fvodn\u00ed voli\u010dsk\u00e1 z\u00e1kladna rozplyne. \u017de nov\u00e9 technologie nutn\u011b zm\u011bn\u00ed slo\u017een\u00ed tradi\u010dn\u00ed klientely a tradi\u010dn\u00edho elektor\u00e1tu socialist\u016f. A \u017ee je t\u0159eba se v\u011bnovat nov\u00fdm t\u00e9mat\u016fm.<\/p>\n
T\u011bmi m\u011bly b\u00fdt tzv. ochrana (ve skute\u010dnosti v\u0161ak zv\u00fdhod\u0148ov\u00e1n\u00ed) men\u0161in, rozkop\u00e1n\u00ed baz\u00e1ln\u00edch spole\u010densk\u00fdch struktur, zasahov\u00e1n\u00ed do intimit (proto\u017ee rodina pr\u00fd zotro\u010duje sv\u00e9 \u010dleny), odn\u00e1rodn\u011bn\u00ed, multikulturalismus a pozd\u011bji tak\u00e9 boj s podneb\u00edm. Tyto proudy nakonec u socialist\u016f zv\u00edt\u011bzily a p\u016fvodn\u00ed levicov\u00fd voli\u010d tak byl opu\u0161t\u011bn. Stal se pak snadnou ko\u0159ist\u00ed nov\u00fdch nevyhran\u011bn\u00fdch \u00fa\u010delov\u00fdch lidov\u00fdch seskupen\u00ed (u n\u00e1s ANO). Jen\u017ee s\u00e1zka na \u201enov\u00e9 levi\u010d\u00e1ctv\u00ed\u201c transformovan\u00fdm socialist\u016fm nevy\u0161la. Pozice, kam cht\u011bli zam\u00ed\u0159it, u\u017e byly obsazen\u00e9 zelen\u00fdmi a pir\u00e1tsk\u00fdmi extremisty, kte\u0159\u00ed daleko d\u0159\u00edve a modern\u011bji (nebo mo\u017en\u00e1 jen m\u00f3dn\u011bji) oslovovali m\u011bstsk\u00e9 mlad\u00e9 levicov\u00e9 intelektu\u00e1ly. Tihle radik\u00e1ln\u00ed progresivist\u00e9 za\u010dali b\u00fdt naz\u00fdv\u00e1ni neomarxisty nebo tak\u00e9 Novou levic\u00ed.<\/p>\n
V dob\u00e1ch dobr\u00e9ho po\u010das\u00ed to m\u011bl tento my\u0161lenkov\u00fd sm\u011br jednodu\u0161\u0161\u00ed. N\u011bkdej\u0161\u00ed boj o z\u00e1kladn\u00ed soci\u00e1ln\u00ed standardy u\u017e nebyl tak aktu\u00e1ln\u00ed, a t\u00edm hlasit\u011bji mohla zn\u00edt hesla zrozen\u00e1 z nudy a p\u0159epychu. V\u00edta\u010dstv\u00ed, slun\u00ed\u010dk\u00e1\u0159stv\u00ed, zelen\u00fd dikt\u00e1t, polysexismus. Kdo by se takov\u00fdmi v\u00fdst\u0159edn\u00edmi podivnostmi zab\u00fdval v dob\u00e1ch, kdy nebylo na chleba.<\/p>\n
Tyhle s\u00edly v dob\u011b prosperity ovl\u00e1dly americk\u00e9 univerzity, m\u00e9dia, sv\u011bt showbusinessu, byrokratick\u00e9 struktury, a nakonec i politiku. A nedlouho pot\u00e9 dobyly i v\u0161echny instituce Evropsk\u00e9 unie, ba i mnoh\u00e9 politick\u00e9 sc\u00e9ny jednotliv\u00fdch \u010dlensk\u00fdch zem\u00ed EU. Jen\u017ee zat\u00edmco pokrok\u00e1\u0159i dokonale zvl\u00e1daj\u00ed um\u011bn\u00ed propagandy, vym\u00fdv\u00e1n\u00ed mozk\u016f a spole\u010densk\u00e9 ostrakizace a \u0161ikany, jednu v\u011bc z principu nikdy um\u011bt nebudou. Zajistit podm\u00ednky pro prosperuj\u00edc\u00ed ekonomiku, a tedy i pro z\u00e1kladn\u00ed soci\u00e1ln\u00ed standardy.<\/p>\n
A tak se stalo to, co se muselo st\u00e1t. Najednou se tahle Nov\u00e1 levice stala levic\u00ed starou. Proto\u017ee byla zrozena pro sv\u011bt blahobytu. A ten nyn\u00ed jej\u00ed vinou kon\u010d\u00ed. Ned\u00e1vn\u00e1 Nov\u00e1 levice je dnes levic\u00ed odch\u00e1zej\u00edc\u00edho sv\u011bta. Proto se ke sv\u011btlu tla\u010d\u00ed levice pro dne\u0161ek. Levice jaksi staronov\u00e1. Obrozen\u00e1, soci\u00e1ln\u00ed, socialistick\u00e1. Proto\u017ee u\u017e zase jde o chleba, o n\u00e1jmy, o cenu sv\u00edcen\u00ed, topen\u00ed a dopravy.<\/p>\n
Jedn\u00edm ze sd\u011blen\u00ed prob\u011bhl\u00fdch voleb je tak to, \u017ee od nyn\u011bj\u0161ka m\u00e1me co do \u010din\u011bn\u00ed s Novou novou levic\u00ed. U n\u00e1s, v N\u011bmecku, ale i v mnoha dal\u0161\u00edch evropsk\u00fdch zem\u00edch. Tyhle nov\u00e9 s\u00edly odm\u00edtaj\u00ed progresivismus. Proto\u017ee z n\u011bj se nikdo nenaj\u00ed. Paradoxn\u011b je tahle Nov\u00e1 nov\u00e1 levice ze spole\u010densk\u00e9ho hlediska sp\u00ed\u0161e konzervativn\u00ed. Akcentuje suverenitu, rodinu, ochranu n\u00e1rodn\u00ed my\u0161lenky. Nepodporuje klimatick\u00e9 blbnut\u00ed ani um\u011blou masovou imigraci.<\/p>\n
A proto\u017ee politiku nyn\u00ed (snad do\u010dasn\u011b) nahradil boj o uchov\u00e1n\u00ed norm\u00e1ln\u00edho sv\u011bta, je tahle Nov\u00e1 nov\u00e1 levice v onom boji sp\u00ed\u0161e na stran\u011b tradice. Jejich voli\u010d nepopt\u00e1v\u00e1 m\u00f3dn\u00ed v\u00fdst\u0159elky. Chce \u010delit chudnut\u00ed.<\/p>\n
Mo\u017en\u00e1 p\u0159ijde \u010das, kdy se k n\u00e1m politika zase vr\u00e1t\u00ed. A\u017e bude norm\u00e1ln\u00ed sv\u011bt zachr\u00e1n\u011bn a progresivismus se ocitne na smeti\u0161ti d\u011bjin. Pak se zase v pln\u00e9 s\u00edle rozho\u0159\u00ed politick\u00e1 sout\u011b\u017e mezi touto Novou levic\u00ed a zast\u00e1nci voln\u00e9ho trhu a maxim\u00e1ln\u00ed svobody jednotlivce. Tak daleko ale je\u0161t\u011b nejsme. Te\u010f jde o z\u00e1chranu h\u0159i\u0161t\u011b, na kter\u00e9m bychom si to jednou op\u011bt mohli rozdat mezi sebou. Jako to v norm\u00e1ln\u00edm sv\u011bt\u011b m\u00e1 b\u00fdt.<\/p>\n
Ned\u00e1 mi dodat je\u0161t\u011b jednu aktu\u00e1ln\u00ed dou\u0161ku, a to na t\u00e9ma planouc\u00ed bitky o tzv. koresponden\u010dn\u00ed hlasov\u00e1n\u00ed ve volb\u00e1ch. Bylo \u00fasm\u011bvn\u00e9 vid\u011bt v\u010dera v televizn\u00edm zpravodajstv\u00ed dva zp\u016fsoby argumentace. Na jedn\u00e9 stran\u011b: koresponden\u010dn\u00ed volba je ne\u00fastavn\u00ed, proto\u017ee nezaru\u010d\u00ed pr\u00e1vo na p\u0159\u00edm\u00e9 a tajn\u00e9 hlasov\u00e1n\u00ed, jej\u00ed v\u00fdsledy mohou b\u00fdt kdykoli z\u00e1sadn\u011b zpochybn\u011bny a pravidla se maj\u00ed m\u011bnit jen konsenzu\u00e1ln\u011b, nikoli na s\u00edlu a v\u011bt\u0161inou n\u011bkolika hlas\u016f. Z druh\u00e9 strany pak zazn\u011bl kouzeln\u011b up\u0159\u00edmn\u00fd postoj: tyhle n\u00e1mitky sly\u0161\u00edme dokola, ale jejich nespr\u00e1vnost p\u0159ece prokazuje fakt, \u017ee koresponden\u010dn\u00ed volba byla zavedena i v jin\u00fdch zem\u00edch. Tedy nikoli v\u011bcn\u00e9 vyvr\u00e1cen\u00ed v\u011bcn\u00fdch n\u00e1mitek ale jen poukazov\u00e1n\u00ed na na\u0161e sv\u011btl\u00e9 zahrani\u010dn\u00ed vzory.<\/p>\n
Jestli se v p\u0159\u00ed\u0161t\u00edch dnech zase ud\u011bl\u00e1 hezky, mo\u017en\u00e1 na ulici potk\u00e1te n\u011bjak\u00e9 podporovatele koresponden\u010dn\u00ed volby, jak dr\u017e\u00ed nad hlavou rozta\u017een\u00fd de\u0161tn\u00edk. A kdy\u017e se jich zept\u00e1te, k \u010demu \u017ee ten de\u0161tn\u00edk, v\u017edy\u0165 p\u0159ece nepr\u0161\u00ed, odpov\u011bd\u00ed v\u00e1m pevn\u00fdm hlasem: ale v Bruselu pr\u00e1v\u011b pr\u0161\u00ed!<\/p>\n
Ladislav Jakl, 13. \u010dervna 2024<\/em><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Existuje v\u016fbec je\u0161t\u011b n\u011bjak\u00e1 politika? Opravdov\u00e1 politika jako usilovn\u00e1 polemika mezi odli\u0161n\u00fdmi spole\u010densk\u00fdmi koncepcemi, mezi r\u016fzn\u00fdmi p\u0159\u00edstupy ke vztahu mezi st\u00e1tem a jednotlivcem? Skoro to vypad\u00e1, \u017ee u\u017e neexistuje.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":9,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"ngg_post_thumbnail":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-14239","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-publikovane-clanky"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.ladislavjakl.cz\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/14239","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.ladislavjakl.cz\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.ladislavjakl.cz\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.ladislavjakl.cz\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/9"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.ladislavjakl.cz\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=14239"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.ladislavjakl.cz\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/14239\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":14240,"href":"https:\/\/www.ladislavjakl.cz\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/14239\/revisions\/14240"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.ladislavjakl.cz\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=14239"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.ladislavjakl.cz\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=14239"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.ladislavjakl.cz\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=14239"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}