Ur\u010dit\u011b zn\u00e1te kouzeln\u00fd neologismus \u201ema\u0161\u00edbl\u201c. Kdo to jsou ma\u0161\u00edblov\u00e9? Mago\u0159i, \u0161\u00edlenci a blbov\u00e9. Takto natvrdo to vypad\u00e1 neesteticky, zat\u00edmco slovo ma\u0161\u00edbl m\u00e1 svou eleganci.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Nov\u00fd term\u00edn \u0161\u00ed\u0159\u00ed hlavn\u011b skeptici, kte\u0159\u00ed varuj\u00ed p\u0159ed podl\u00e9h\u00e1n\u00edm r\u016fzn\u00fdm f\u00e1m\u00e1m, p\u0159ed nepodlo\u017een\u00fdmi spekulacemi, un\u00e1hlen\u00fdm vyn\u00e1\u0161en\u00edm ortel\u016f, panik\u00e1\u0159stv\u00edm a \u201ezaru\u010den\u00fdmi\u201c teoriemi o spiknut\u00ed mocn\u00fdch. Skepse je zdrav\u00e1 vlastnost a pom\u00e1h\u00e1 n\u00e1m, abychom se nespla\u0161ili hned pot\u00e9, co se s\u00a0n\u011bjak\u00fdm virem \u0161\u00ed\u0159en\u00fdm ve spole\u010dnosti setk\u00e1me. (Pokud se ov\u0161em skepse nestane jedin\u00fdm n\u00e1hra\u017ekov\u00fdm \u017eivotn\u00edm programem, vytla\u010duj\u00edc\u00edm \u0161anci v\u00a0n\u011bco v\u011b\u0159it a zpochyb\u0148uj\u00edc\u00edm z\u00e1kladn\u00ed kameny, na kter\u00fdch stoj\u00ed na\u0161e v\u011bdom\u00ed a v\u011bd\u011bn\u00ed.)<\/p>\n
Sami skeptici ov\u0161em n\u011bkter\u00e9 takov\u00e9 teorie sami \u0161\u00ed\u0159\u00ed, kdy\u017e se jejich pochybnosti vkr\u00e1daj\u00ed do sv\u011bta jistot. Ov\u0161em n\u011bkter\u00e9 jistoty si zpochybn\u011bn\u00ed zaslou\u017e\u00ed, a kter\u00e9 to jsou, to nelze v\u017edy p\u0159edem zn\u00e1t.<\/p>\n
Ka\u017ed\u00fd, kdo zpochybn\u00ed n\u011bjakou prefabrikovanou a v\u0161eobecn\u00fdm ve\u0159ejn\u00fdm m\u00edn\u011bn\u00edm slep\u011b p\u0159ij\u00edmanou tezi, nemus\u00ed b\u00fdt hned ma\u0161\u00edbl. Co tez\u00ed, kter\u00e9 byly sv\u00e9ho \u010dasu pova\u017eov\u00e1ny za nezpochybniteln\u00e9, se ve sv\u011btle nov\u00fdch zku\u0161enost\u00ed obr\u00e1tily v\u00a0prach\u2026<\/p>\n
V\u00a0ka\u017ed\u00e9m p\u0159\u00edpad\u011b jsou konspira\u010dn\u00ed teorie v\u00a0m\u00f3d\u011b. U\u017e dobr\u00fdch sto let. A ta m\u00f3da evidentn\u011b je\u0161t\u011b nedosp\u011bla ke sv\u00e9mu vrcholu. Asi to souvis\u00ed s\u00a0rol\u00ed masov\u00fdch m\u00e9di\u00ed.<\/p>\n
Hlavn\u00ed proud masov\u00fdch m\u00e9di\u00ed m\u00e1 z \u201ekonspir\u00e1tor\u016f\u201c legraci. Mnohdy pr\u00e1vem. Je-li n\u011bkdo v\u00a0m\u00e9di\u00edch ozna\u010den za \u0161i\u0159itele konspira\u010dn\u00edch teori\u00ed, je to ch\u00e1p\u00e1no skoro jako diagn\u00f3za. Jak\u00e9koli tvrzen\u00ed takto ozna\u010den\u00fdch lid\u00ed je se shov\u00edvav\u00fdm \u00fasm\u011bvem odk\u00e1z\u00e1no do \u0159\u00ed\u0161e blouzn\u011bn\u00ed.<\/p>\n
Existuj\u00ed ale v\u00fdjimky (a to je velmi zaj\u00edmav\u00e9), kdy se sama m\u00e9dia hlavn\u00edho proudu st\u00e1vaj\u00ed nejv\u011bt\u0161\u00edmi \u0161i\u0159iteli f\u00e1m, konspira\u010dn\u00edch teori\u00ed, nepodlo\u017een\u00fdch spekulac\u00ed \u010di fale\u0161n\u00fdch obvin\u011bn\u00ed. Stejn\u00ed novin\u00e1\u0159i, kte\u0159\u00ed si v\u00a0jedn\u00e9 v\u011bt\u011b trop\u00ed b\u017eundu z\u00a0ma\u0161\u00edbl\u016f, za\u010dnou v\u00a0jin\u00e9 v\u011bt\u011b ma\u0161\u00edblovat sami, jakmile p\u0159ijde na t\u00e9mata: privatizace, opozi\u010dn\u00ed smlouva, amnestie. Tam mnoh\u00fdm novin\u00e1\u0159\u016fm nedostatek dat nevad\u00ed, nevad\u00ed jim ani naprost\u00e9 v\u00fdmysly a pomluvy.<\/p>\n
Sv\u016fj ter\u010d si vybrali a proti n\u011bmu je p\u0159ece ka\u017ed\u00fd, i ten sebevymy\u0161len\u011bj\u0161\u00ed \u00fatok dobr\u00fd. Prost\u011b: kdy\u017e nen\u00e1vid\u00ed\u0161, nen\u00ed co \u0159e\u0161it. U nen\u00e1vid\u011bn\u00e9ho se v\u011b\u0159\u00ed v\u0161emu, nebo se to alespo\u0148 p\u0159ipou\u0161t\u00ed. Tam se d\u016fkazy nevy\u017eaduj\u00ed.<\/p>\n
Kdo vede na\u0161e hlavn\u00ed m\u00e9dia? Kdo z\u00a0nich d\u011bl\u00e1 hl\u00e1sn\u00e9 trouby bl\u00e1zniv\u00fdch konspira\u010dn\u00edch teori\u00ed?<\/p>\n
Ma.<\/p>\n
\u0160\u00ed.<\/p>\n
Bl.<\/p>\n