{"id":8112,"date":"2017-12-06T11:44:06","date_gmt":"2017-12-06T10:44:06","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.ladislavjakl.cz\/?p=8112"},"modified":"2017-12-06T11:44:06","modified_gmt":"2017-12-06T10:44:06","slug":"ladislav-jakl-stara-levice-umrela-nova-prebira-moc","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.ladislavjakl.cz\/?p=8112","title":{"rendered":"Ladislav Jakl: Star\u00e1 levice um\u0159ela. Nov\u00e1 p\u0159eb\u00edr\u00e1 moc."},"content":{"rendered":"

Soci\u00e1ln\u00ed demokrat\u00e9 o v\u00edkendu sn\u011bmovali v Hradci Kr\u00e1lov\u00e9. Se\u0161el se tam poprv\u00e9 po prohran\u00fdch volb\u00e1ch jejich \u00dast\u0159edn\u00ed v\u00fdkonn\u00fd v\u00fdbor a bylo to jedn\u00e1n\u00ed nevesel\u00e9. Maj\u00ed o \u010dem p\u0159em\u00fd\u0161let, musej\u00ed n\u011bjak vyhodnotit tragick\u00e9 volebn\u00ed v\u00fdsledky a rozhodnout se, jak nyn\u00ed d\u00e1l. Ale maj\u00ed v\u016fbec \u201ekam d\u00e1l\u201c? Nen\u00ed divu, \u017ee padaj\u00ed i velmi krajn\u00ed n\u00e1pady, jako t\u0159eba u\u010dinit mesi\u00e1\u0161em strany hejtmana kraje Vyso\u010dina Ji\u0159\u00edho B\u011bhounka, k \u010demu\u017e by ale bylo nutno zm\u011bnit stanovy strany, proto\u017ee B\u011bhounek dosud ani \u010dlenem \u010cSSD nen\u00ed.<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

Vra\u0165me se ale je\u0161t\u011b o \u010dty\u0159i t\u00fddny zp\u011bt, k samotn\u00fdm volebn\u00edm v\u00fdsledk\u016fm. Ty p\u0159inesly velik\u00e9 politick\u00e9 zem\u011bt\u0159esen\u00ed, v\u00fdm\u011bnu elit, p\u0159\u00edchod rekordn\u00edho po\u010dtu poslaneck\u00fdch nov\u00e1\u010dk\u016f a u n\u00e1s d\u0159\u00edve nev\u00eddan\u00e9 rozdroben\u00ed politick\u00e9 sc\u00e9ny mezi dev\u011bt parlamentn\u00edch politick\u00fdch stran. Za samostatnou \u00favahu ale stoj\u00ed naprosto bezp\u0159\u00edkladn\u00fd p\u00e1d levice, kter\u00e1 od posledn\u00edch voleb ztratila v\u00edce ne\u017e polovinu hlas\u016f. Sou\u010det pod\u00edlu hlas\u016f pro \u010cSSD a KS\u010cM poklesl z 35,36 % v roce 2013 na leto\u0161n\u00edch 15,03 %, a to je p\u00e1d, jeho\u017e velikost nep\u0159edv\u00eddal \u017e\u00e1dn\u00fd medi\u00e1ln\u00ed politolog, ani \u017e\u00e1dn\u00fd drah\u00fd a sofistikovan\u00fd sociologick\u00fd pr\u016fzkum. P\u00e1d sv\u00fdm rozm\u011brem evidentn\u011b p\u0159es\u00e1hl i leckdy bujnou p\u0159edstavivost politick\u00fdch pozorovatel\u016f.<\/p>\n

Existovala n\u011bjak\u00e1 levice?<\/strong><\/p>\n

M\u00e1 smysl se n\u011bjak zab\u00fdvat spole\u010dn\u00fdm ziskem t\u011bchto dvou stran a m\u00e1 v\u016fbec smysl pou\u017e\u00edvat pro n\u011b n\u011bjak\u00fd zast\u0159e\u0161uj\u00edc\u00ed term\u00edn, tedy \u201elevice\u201c? M\u00e1. M\u00e1, u\u017e historicky, proto\u017ee komunistick\u00e1 strana vznikla v roce 1921 od\u0161t\u011bpen\u00edm od soci\u00e1ln\u00ed demokracie, pak sama po roce 1948 svou \u201ematku\u201c spolkla, aby v roce 1990 soci\u00e1ln\u00ed demokracie op\u011bt vznikla \u2013 sice na zelen\u00e9 louce, ale s explicitn\u011b zd\u016frazn\u011bnou kontinuitou se svou p\u0159edch\u016fdkyn\u00ed (u\u017e kv\u016fli uplat\u0148ov\u00e1n\u00ed sporn\u00e9ho n\u00e1roku na miliardov\u00fd majetek v podob\u011b Lidov\u00e9ho domu).<\/p>\n

Nejde ale jen o historii. \u010cSSD se \u010dasto sice naoko od komunist\u016f ohrazovala, ale velice \u010dasto takticky pou\u017e\u00edvala spojenectv\u00ed s komunisty p\u0159i mnoha v\u00e1\u017en\u00fdch vyjedn\u00e1v\u00e1n\u00edch i p\u0159i hlasov\u00e1n\u00edch v Poslaneck\u00e9 sn\u011bmovn\u011b. Komunist\u00e9 zase \u010dasto odm\u00edtali nechat se strkat do jednoho pytle s \u010cSSD, proto\u017ee to by si leckter\u00fd jejich voli\u010d mohl \u0159\u00edci, \u017ee nemus\u00ed po\u0159\u00e1d volit stranu, \u017eij\u00edc\u00ed v\u011b\u010dn\u011b v izolaci p\u0159i jedn\u00e1n\u00ed o vl\u00e1d\u00e1ch, ale m\u016f\u017ee volit tu \u201elegitimn\u011bj\u0161\u00ed\u201c levici. Komunist\u00e9 proto museli p\u0159i komunikaci s voli\u010dem volit mnohdy mnohem radik\u00e1ln\u011bj\u0161\u00ed r\u00e9toriku, ne\u017e kterou pou\u017e\u00edvali b\u011b\u017en\u011b p\u0159i sv\u00fdch politick\u00fdch k\u0161eftech v parlamentu. I d\u00edky tomu pravideln\u011b posilovali tehdy, kdy\u017e zrovna vl\u00e1dla \u010cSSD, proto\u017ee p\u0159edstavovali pro mnoho voli\u010d\u016f tu pravou radik\u00e1ln\u00ed levici, zat\u00edmco vl\u00e1dou v \u201ebur\u017eoazn\u00edm st\u00e1tu\u201c poznamenan\u00e1 soci\u00e1ln\u00ed demokracie o radik\u00e1ln\u00ed voli\u010de b\u011bhem vl\u00e1dnut\u00ed \u010dasto p\u0159ich\u00e1zela. Pokud ale byly ob\u011b strany v opozici, p\u0159edstavovaly v\u011bt\u0161inou koordinovanou politickou s\u00edlu a rozdaly si to zase a\u017e v kampani.<\/p>\n

Zapojit tuto nomin\u00e1ln\u00ed politickou s\u00edlu do p\u0159\u00edm\u00e9ho boje o moc si ale dlouho nikdo netroufal. Nejbl\u00ed\u017ee k tomu m\u011bl Milo\u0161 Zeman, kter\u00fd v roce 1996 mohl \u0159\u00edkat, \u017ee m\u00e1 s komunisty a republik\u00e1ny \u2013 kter\u00e9 on s\u00e1m naz\u00fdval \u201ezdivo\u010del\u00fdmi soci\u00e1ln\u00edmi demokraty\u201c \u2013 parlamentn\u00ed v\u011bt\u0161inu a tud\u00ed\u017e n\u00e1rok na sestaven\u00ed levicov\u00e9 koali\u010dn\u00ed vl\u00e1dy (levice \u010cSSD + KS\u010cM + SPR-RS\u010c z\u00edskala tehdy ve volb\u00e1ch dohromady sto jednoho poslance). Ale netroufl si, jednak kv\u016fli tehdej\u0161\u00ed m\u00ed\u0159e spole\u010densk\u00e9 nep\u0159ijatelnosti komunist\u016f ve vl\u00e1d\u011b, jednak kv\u016fli odporu ve vlastn\u00ed stran\u011b. Obrat \u201estojedni\u010dka pro levici\u201c tak tehdy nikoho ani nenapadl.<\/p>\n

Daleko m\u00e9n\u011b ohled\u016f m\u011bl v tomto smyslu o deset let pozd\u011bji Ji\u0159\u00ed Paroubek, kter\u00fd se nejd\u0159\u00edv t\u011bsn\u011b p\u0159ed volbami v roce 2006 nerozpakoval hodit p\u0159es palubu sv\u00e9 tehdej\u0161\u00ed koali\u010dn\u00ed spojence lidovce a unionisty a schvalovac\u00edm kombajnem \u010cSSD + KS\u010cM odhlasov\u00e1val jeden z\u00e1kon za druh\u00fdm (na t\u011bchto n\u011bkolik t\u00fddn\u016f p\u0159ipad\u00e1 podstatn\u00e1 \u010d\u00e1st uplatn\u011bn\u00fdch prezidentsk\u00fdch vet V\u00e1clava Klause za cel\u00e9 jeho desetilet\u00e9 funk\u010dn\u00ed obdob\u00ed), a pot\u00e9 t\u011bsn\u011b po t\u011bchto volb\u00e1ch, ve kter\u00fdch socialist\u00e9 s komunisty z\u00edskali rovnou stovku, vyu\u017eil t\u00e9to stovky k zablokov\u00e1n\u00ed nov\u011b zvolen\u00e9 Poslaneck\u00e9 sn\u011bmovny (a tedy k oddalov\u00e1n\u00ed povinn\u00e9 demise sv\u00e9 vl\u00e1dy) po n\u011bkolik m\u011bs\u00edc\u016f. Tehdy u\u017e v\u00fdraz \u201estovka\u201c pro sou\u010det poslanc\u016f \u010cSSD a KS\u010cM nebyl \u017e\u00e1dn\u00fdm sprost\u00fdm slovem, ale b\u011b\u017en\u00fdm argumentem, bez uzard\u011bn\u00ed pou\u017e\u00edvan\u00fdm kdekter\u00fdm koment\u00e1torem. P\u0159itom \u017e\u00e1dn\u00e1 sjednocen\u00e1 levice tehdy p\u0159ece do parlamentu nekandidovala.<\/p>\n

Tabu padlo a t\u00edm i jak\u00e9koli rozpaky \u010di pochybnosti o re\u00e1lnosti obsahu slova \u201elevice\u201c coby sou\u010dtu sil \u010cSSD. Co\u017e potvrdila i n\u00e1sledn\u00e1 hlasovac\u00ed realita p\u0159\u00ed\u0161t\u00edch let. Ano, tabu padlo, ale padla i tehdej\u0161\u00ed \u010d\u00edsla koketuj\u00edc\u00ed se stovkovou hranic\u00ed: dnes m\u00e1 levice v Poslaneck\u00fdch lavic\u00edch dohromady pouh\u00fdch 30 k\u0159esel. Pro\u010d? Jak je takov\u00fd krach mo\u017en\u00fd? Jak je vysv\u011btliteln\u00fd?<\/p>\n

<\/a><\/p>\n

P\u0159edev\u0161\u00edm m\u00e1 smysl se o spole\u010dn\u00e9m krachu KS\u010cM a \u010cSSD bavit, proto\u017ee p\u00e1d ve volb\u00e1ch je ob\u011bma stran\u00e1m spole\u010dn\u00fd a v podobn\u00e9m rozm\u011bru ho s \u017e\u00e1dnou jinou stranou nesd\u00edlej\u00ed. Tak\u00e9 m\u00e1 smysl se bavit po p\u00e1du levice, tak, jak jsme si zvykli ji ozna\u010dovat, proto\u017ee tentokr\u00e1t nebyl dramatick\u00fd \u00fabytek jedn\u00e9 z obou stran prov\u00e1zen alespo\u0148 m\u00edrn\u00fdm pos\u00edlen\u00edm t\u00e9 druh\u00e9, \u010dili p\u0159el\u00e9v\u00e1n\u00edm voli\u010d\u016f z jedn\u00e9 strany do druh\u00e9. Je to p\u00e1d spole\u010dn\u00fd a nen\u00ed um\u011blou konstrukc\u00ed tvrdit, \u017ee i p\u0159\u00ed\u010diny obou p\u00e1d\u016f mohou b\u00fdt do zna\u010dn\u00e9 m\u00edry spole\u010dn\u00e9.<\/p>\n

Komunistick\u00fd voli\u010d chce protest, ne salonn\u00ed \u0159e\u010di<\/strong><\/p>\n

U komunist\u016f je paradoxn\u011b volebn\u00ed propad vysv\u011btliteln\u00fd pon\u011bkud m\u00e9n\u011b jednozna\u010dn\u011b. Zcela lich\u00e9 se k\u00e1zaly b\u00fdt p\u0159edpov\u011bdi ze za\u010d\u00e1tku 90. let, \u017ee voli\u010di t\u00e9to strany postupn\u011b prost\u011b vym\u0159ou, \u017ee jich bude pomalu ale jist\u011b ub\u00fdvat. To se v\u016fbec neprok\u00e1zalo. Asi maj\u00ed zdrav\u011bj\u0161\u00ed ko\u0159\u00ednek, ne\u017e si leckdo myslel, a asi tato \u2013 nyn\u00ed ji\u017e s papal\u00e1\u0161sk\u00fdm establishmentem nespojovan\u00e1 a sp\u00ed\u0161e vyprofilovan\u011b protestn\u00ed \u2013 strana um\u00ed p\u0159irozen\u00fd \u00fabytek pr\u016fb\u011b\u017en\u011b dopl\u0148ovat i novou krv\u00ed protikapitalistick\u00e9 revoltuj\u00edc\u00ed ml\u00e1de\u017ee, jako tomu ostatn\u011b bylo i v mnoha z\u00e1padoevropsk\u00fdch zem\u00edch. V\u00fdsledky komunist\u016f nep\u0159ipom\u00ednaly o\u010dek\u00e1vanou skluzavku, ale sp\u00ed\u0161 horskou dr\u00e1hu: nahoru, dol\u016f. V roce 1996 m\u011bli komunist\u00e9 jen 10,33 %, v roce 2002 skoro dvojn\u00e1sobek: 18,51 %. Nyn\u00ed \u0161lo o ale p\u00e1d skoro na polovinu oproti p\u0159edchoz\u00edm volb\u00e1m na rekordn\u011b n\u00edzkou \u00farove\u0148.<\/p>\n

Jin\u00e1 \u2013 celkem logick\u00e1 \u2013 \u00favaha m\u016f\u017ee zn\u00edt, \u017ee radik\u00e1ln\u00ed voli\u010di KS\u010cM nejsou spokojeni s uhlazen\u00fdm stylem salonn\u00edch levi\u010d\u00e1k\u016f Filipa a spol. a \u017ee ost\u0159eji protisyst\u00e9mov\u00e9 postoje nyn\u00ed nach\u00e1zej\u00ed u jin\u00fdch, nov\u00fdch stran. Faktem je, \u017ee \u201esalonn\u00ed levi\u010d\u00e1ctv\u00ed\u201c dosud komunist\u016fm u voli\u010dstva proch\u00e1zelo. Tak pro\u010d nyn\u00ed ne? Proto\u017ee si o hlasy nespokojen\u00fdch radik\u00e1l\u016f a\u017e dosud nikdo ne\u0159ekl. Nyn\u00ed u\u017e ano. Pir\u00e1ti, okamurovci\u2026<\/p>\n

Havlismus: parazit v t\u011ble soci\u00e1ln\u00edch demokrat\u016f<\/strong><\/p>\n

U soci\u00e1ln\u00ed demokracie jde do jist\u00e9 m\u00edry o podobnou p\u0159\u00ed\u010dinu p\u00e1du: etablov\u00e1n\u00ed konkurence na levicov\u00e9m p\u00edse\u010dku, a to nikoli od komunist\u016f, odkud to \u0161pi\u010dky \u010cSSD v\u017edy \u010dekaly, ale z nonkonformn\u00edch vod m\u011bstsk\u00e9 ml\u00e1de\u017ee a tak\u00e9 od \u201ehodn\u00fdch pravi\u010d\u00e1k\u016f\u201c. Jen\u017ee p\u0159\u00ed\u010diny p\u00e1du \u010cSSD jsou prim\u00e1rn\u011b vnit\u0159n\u00ed. Nen\u00ed to tak dlouho, co autor t\u011bchto \u0159\u00e1dek varoval \u010cSSD p\u0159ed havlismem. \u017de dopadnou jako o n\u011bco d\u0159\u00edve havlismem naka\u017een\u00e1 ODS.<\/p>\n

P\u00e1d \u010cSSD je naprosto katastrof\u00e1ln\u00ed. Soci\u00e1ln\u00ed demokrat\u00e9 jsou dosud na v\u0161ech kl\u00ed\u010dov\u00fdch postech ve st\u00e1t\u011b! Prezidentem je soci\u00e1ln\u00ed demokrat, p\u0159edsedou horn\u00ed parlamentn\u00ed komory soci\u00e1ln\u00ed demokrat, p\u0159edsedou doln\u00ed komory soci\u00e1ln\u00ed demokrat, p\u0159edsedou vl\u00e1dy soci\u00e1ln\u00ed demokrat, p\u0159edsedou \u00dastavn\u00edho soudu soci\u00e1ln\u00ed demokrat\u2026 A tato s\u00edla dostane ve volb\u00e1ch sedm procent! Jak k tomu do\u0161lo?<\/p>\n

\u010cSSD zejm\u00e9na v posledn\u00edm volebn\u00edm obdob\u00ed (ale projevovalo se to u\u017e od roku 2010) zcela rezignovala na sv\u00e9 tradi\u010dn\u00ed voli\u010de a tradi\u010dn\u00ed soci\u00e1ln\u00ed t\u00e9mata. \u201eSocansk\u00fd\u201c voli\u010d b\u00fdval v\u011bt\u0161inou zam\u011bstnanec, kter\u00fd si p\u0159\u00e1l vy\u0161\u0161\u00ed p\u0159erozd\u011blov\u00e1n\u00ed, vy\u0161\u0161\u00ed platy, lep\u0161\u00ed soci\u00e1ln\u00ed zabezpe\u010den\u00ed a funguj\u00edc\u00ed st\u00e1tn\u00ed ma\u0161inu. Ze v\u0161ech voli\u010dsk\u00fdch skupin m\u011bl paradoxn\u011b patrn\u011b nejd\u00e1l k m\u00f3dn\u00edm t\u00e9mat\u016fm, kter\u00e9 si veden\u00ed \u010desk\u00e9 soci\u00e1ln\u00ed demokracie vyp\u016fj\u010dilo od havlist\u016f, od m\u011bstsk\u00e9 liber\u00e1ln\u00ed intelektu\u00e1ln\u00ed levice. Je pro tradi\u010dn\u00edho voli\u010de \u010cSSD prioritou multikulturn\u00ed politika? Potla\u010dov\u00e1n\u00ed tradic? \u00datok na rodinu? Bizarn\u00ed experimenty s t\u0159et\u00edmi a kdov\u00edkolik\u00e1t\u00fdmi pohlav\u00edmi? Radik\u00e1ln\u00edm feminismus? Likvidace \u010desk\u00e9ho stroj\u00edrenstv\u00ed, energetiky, t\u011b\u017eebn\u00edho pr\u016fmyslu s t\u00edm, \u017ee nov\u00e1 \u201evzd\u011blanostn\u00ed\u201c ekonomika je nebude pot\u0159ebovat? A\u017e extr\u00e9mn\u00ed eurohujerstv\u00ed? To jist\u011b nezn\u011blo soci\u00e1ln\u011b demokratick\u00e9mu voli\u010di jako hudba, za kterou by cht\u011bl j\u00edt.<\/p>\n

Politici jako Diensbier \u010di Marksov\u00e1 byli \u00fa\u010dinn\u011bj\u0161\u00edm kladivem na udiven\u00e9ho soci\u00e1ln\u011b demokratick\u00e9ho voli\u010de, ne\u017e jak\u00e1koli mysliteln\u00e1 politick\u00e1 konkurence. A do toho Bohuslav Sobotka, pro kter\u00e9ho z\u00e1jmy Berl\u00edna a Bruselu byly v\u017edy viditeln\u011b bli\u017e\u0161\u00ed, ne\u017e z\u00e1jmy a pot\u0159eby pracuj\u00edc\u00edho n\u011bkde v severn\u00edm pohrani\u010d\u00ed. Veden\u00ed soci\u00e1ln\u00ed demokracie zkr\u00e1tka vedlo nesmi\u0159itelnou v\u00e1lku se sv\u00fdmi vlastn\u00edmi voli\u010di a myslelo si, \u017ee j\u00ed to projde. Nepro\u0161lo.<\/p>\n

Veden\u00ed \u010cSSD se agresivn\u00edm vnitropolitick\u00fdm bojem rovn\u011b\u017e zbavilo v\u0161ech viditeln\u00fdch figur, kter\u00e9 pro voli\u010de p\u0159edstavovaly srozumitelnou socialistickou politiku. A m\u00edsto nich vystr\u010dilo na sv\u00e9 vlastn\u00ed voli\u010de tv\u00e1\u0159e (a kdov\u00ed, jestli tv\u00e1\u0159e) kluzk\u00fdch rejdil\u016f v byrokratick\u00fdch ba\u017ein\u00e1ch bruselsk\u00fdch direktiv.<\/p>\n

M\u00edsto nekrologu \u010cSSD<\/strong><\/p>\n

Po dlouhou dobu mi to nebylo jedno. V\u017edy jsem si myslel, \u017ee funguj\u00edc\u00ed demokracie pot\u0159ebuje funguj\u00edc\u00ed soci\u00e1ln\u011b demokratickou stranu. A \u017ee parazit havlismu je schopen vyhlodat ve\u0161ker\u00e9 maso takov\u00e9 strany a prom\u011bnit ji v pr\u00e1zdnou sko\u0159\u00e1pku. To jsem si nikdy nep\u0159\u00e1l, jakkoli jsem \u017e\u00e1dn\u00e9 sympatie k soci\u00e1ln\u00edm demokrat\u016fm nikdy nechoval.<\/p>\n

To se ale zm\u011bnilo jen n\u011bkolik t\u00fddn\u016f p\u0159ed volbami. Najednou mi za\u010dal b\u00fdt osud \u010cSSD lhostejn\u00fd. Proto\u017ee ona u\u017e \u017e\u00e1dn\u00e1 ve skute\u010dnosti neexistovala. Je t\u0159eba se sm\u00ed\u0159it s t\u00edm, \u017ee ji sobotkovsk\u00e9 veden\u00ed definitivn\u011b poh\u0159bilo. Jist\u011b\u017ee to neznamen\u00e1 konec levice. Jej\u00ed ide\u00e1ly jsou dnes rozpu\u0161t\u011bny v r\u016fzn\u00e9 m\u00ed\u0159e ve v\u0161ech parlamentn\u00edch stran\u00e1ch a tak\u00e9 nap\u0159\u00ed\u010d spole\u010dnost\u00ed. Budou ale nap\u0159\u00ed\u0161t\u011b formulov\u00e1ny a prosazov\u00e1ny \u201enovou levic\u00ed\u201c, zat\u00edmco tradi\u010dn\u00ed \u201esocansk\u00fd\u201c voli\u010d z\u016fstane opu\u0161t\u011bn, pokud se ho neujme n\u011bjak\u00e1 ta strana jednoho t\u00e9matu a na jedno pou\u017eit\u00ed.<\/p>\n

Pro \u010dlov\u011bka, h\u00e1j\u00edc\u00edho individu\u00e1ln\u00ed svobody p\u0159ed rovnost\u00e1\u0159stv\u00edm a kolektivismem, tu nap\u0159\u00ed\u0161t\u011b bude jin\u00fd soupe\u0159. Nov\u00e1 levice. Multikulturn\u00ed, radik\u00e1ln\u011b genderistick\u00e1, postdemoratick\u00e1, postpr\u016fmyslov\u00e1, asoci\u00e1ln\u00ed, ekofanatick\u00e1, eurofanatick\u00e1, internacion\u00e1ln\u00ed. Bude to ale soupe\u0159, kter\u00fd vede politick\u00fd boj prim\u00e1rn\u011b mimopolitick\u00fdmi a mimodemokratick\u00fdmi prost\u0159edky a mimo politickou p\u016fdu, p\u0159es z\u00e1jmov\u00e9 a n\u00e1tlakov\u00e9 organizace. Soci\u00e1ln\u00ed demokracii u\u017e pot\u0159ebovat nebude, odhodil ji jako onu vyhlodanou sko\u0159\u00e1pku. Sv\u00e9 p\u00e1ky bude m\u00edt v nov\u00fdch uskupen\u00edch a nejsp\u00ed\u0161 si samo slovo \u201elevice\u201c zak\u00e1\u017ee.<\/p>\n

Levicov\u00fd voli\u010d ale po\u0159\u00e1d \u017eije. Opu\u0161t\u011bn, zrazen, zklam\u00e1n. Zaj\u00edm\u00e1 to n\u011bkoho? Zd\u00e1 se, \u017ee ne. Nikdo s trumpovsk\u00fdmi hesly o \u201erezav\u00e9m pruhu zem\u011b\u201c si o jeho podporu ne\u0159ekne. Na tom chystan\u00e9 ro\u0161\u00e1dy v \u010cSSD u\u017e nic nezm\u011bn\u00ed, b\u00fdvaly by musely p\u0159ij\u00edt u\u017e p\u0159ed n\u011bkolika lety.<\/p>\n

Ladislav Jakl, 21. listopadu 2017.<\/em><\/p>\n

Zdroj<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Soci\u00e1ln\u00ed demokrat\u00e9 o v\u00edkendu sn\u011bmovali v Hradci Kr\u00e1lov\u00e9. Se\u0161el se tam poprv\u00e9 po prohran\u00fdch volb\u00e1ch jejich \u00dast\u0159edn\u00ed v\u00fdkonn\u00fd v\u00fdbor a bylo to jedn\u00e1n\u00ed nevesel\u00e9. Maj\u00ed o \u010dem p\u0159em\u00fd\u0161let, musej\u00ed n\u011bjak vyhodnotit tragick\u00e9 volebn\u00ed v\u00fdsledky a rozhodnout se, jak nyn\u00ed d\u00e1l. Ale maj\u00ed v\u016fbec \u201ekam d\u00e1l\u201c? Nen\u00ed divu, \u017ee padaj\u00ed i velmi krajn\u00ed n\u00e1pady, jako t\u0159eba u\u010dinit mesi\u00e1\u0161em […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"ngg_post_thumbnail":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-8112","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-publikovane-clanky"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.ladislavjakl.cz\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8112","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.ladislavjakl.cz\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.ladislavjakl.cz\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.ladislavjakl.cz\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.ladislavjakl.cz\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=8112"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.ladislavjakl.cz\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8112\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":8113,"href":"https:\/\/www.ladislavjakl.cz\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8112\/revisions\/8113"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.ladislavjakl.cz\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=8112"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.ladislavjakl.cz\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=8112"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.ladislavjakl.cz\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=8112"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}